What the engines say when your buyers ask, and what to do about it
Bluemoon Intelligence measures your visibility per market and engine, weights every question by buying intent, ranks the sources the engines rely on, tracks the competitors they name, and turns the gaps into briefs that carry their evidence with them.
Every answer, as the engine wrote it
One buyer question, put to every engine, every day, from inside each market.
What's the best waterproof hardshell jacket for alpine climbing?
For alpine climbing, the most recommended hardshells are the Alpsteel Ridgeline AR for durability, the Northlark Solano as a value pick, and the Ridgewell Cirrus Pro as a lighter option. Reviewers at GearBench rate the Ridgeline AR highest for sustained bad weather.
Illustrative example · fictional answers. “Quoted” and “consulted” are reported by the engines that expose them; the others show only what they quoted.
The Intelligence modules
Visibility, competitors, prompts, citations, intent, alerts, agents and actions: what each one answers, drawn.
Visibility
The share of answers that name you, per engine and market, with the count next to every rate.
Illustrations, not screens. The product itself we show you in a demo.
Visibility you can trace back to answers
A score per market and per engine, built from stored answers. Whether you were named or recommended, and how citations move over time.
Illustration, not a screen: your share of answers, how it moves, who is cited beside you, and the sources behind it.
A score per market and engine
Answers are collected from inside each country you sell in, so Germany and the United States are two measurements, not one. Every score shows the number of answers behind it.
Named is not recommended
Each brand in an answer gets a role: recommended, listed, mentioned, caveated or absent. Visibility counts every name; recommendation rate counts only the first role.
Citations over time
Which of your pages the engines cited, how often, and how that changes week to week, shown next to the previous period.
Not every question is worth the same
Every tracked question carries a weight for how close it sits to a purchase, so a gap on a buying question ranks above a gap on a definition.
- Transactional
- The buyer is choosing what to buy or where to buy it. A gap on these questions is the first thing to fix.
- Comparison
- Two or more options side by side. Whether you are recommended, listed or named with a caveat matters most here.
- Informational
- How something works or what to look for. Useful for being present early in a decision, and weighted lower.
The sources the engines rely on, and how to reach them
Every domain and URL cited in your answers, ranked by how often each engine used it across your questions. Then the practical part: whether you can buy a place there, pitch one, or have to earn it.
Run ads
The site sells advertising. Bluemoon names who sells it and links to the public record it relied on, so your media team can buy directly or through the sales house.
Ad-targeting sources are included on Growth.Pitch
No inventory for sale, but an editor who publishes reviews, comparisons or listings. The brief names the page the engines cite and how many of your questions it appears in.
Earned
Competitor pages, retailers you already list with, communities. There is no shortcut here, and the product says so rather than suggesting one.
Competitors, as the engines see them
The brands you chose to compare against, and the ones the engines keep naming that you did not.
The ones you chose
Named when you set up the workspace, up to your plan's allowance. Each is measured on every question, engine and market you track, with the same roles as your own brand.
The ones the engines detected
Every brand named in a stored answer is recorded, whether or not it is on your list. When one keeps appearing, the product suggests adding it and shows the answers it was found in.
Briefs that carry their evidence
A gap becomes a brief your content, PR or listings team can act on: a page to publish, a placement to pitch, a listing to correct. Each brief names where it came from.
The questions
Which tracked questions the gap was observed on, with the answer count behind each.
The engines
Which engines showed the gap and which did not, so a brief for one engine is not mistaken for a brief for all of them.
The sources
The cited pages the brief points at, and how many of your questions they appear in.
The intent weight
Why the brief ranks where it does, and whether that weight was anchored on ad prices or read from the wording.
Briefs with measured impact, which track the same questions after the work is done, are included from Core.
One answer, worked through
An illustrative example: one question, one engine, one market, and what Bluemoon does with the answer.
What's the best waterproof hardshell jacket for alpine climbing?
For alpine climbing, the most recommended hardshells are the Alpsteel Ridgeline AR for durability, the Northlark Solano as a value pick, and the Ridgewell Cirrus Pro as a lighter option. Reviewers at GearBench and TrailNotes rate the Ridgeline AR highest for sustained bad weather, while the Cirrus Pro is praised for mobility on technical routes.
Brands in this answer
- AAlpsteel Recommended
- NNorthlark Listed
- RRidgewell YouMentioned
- VVantera Not named
The gap, across 6 engines
- Alpsteel recommended5 of 6
- Ridgewell named3 of 6
- Ridgewell recommended0 of 6
Proposed action
Get the Cirrus Pro into GearBench’s alpine hardshell review.
That page is cited by 3 of 6 engines for this question and for 14 other questions you track.
The question is asked and the answer is stored
“What's the best waterproof hardshell jacket for alpine climbing?” goes to ChatGPT from inside the United States, logged out. The full answer is stored with the time it was collected and the three sources it relied on.
Brands and their roles are read from the answer
Alpsteel is recommended, Northlark is listed as a value pick, Ridgewell is mentioned as a lighter option and Vantera is not named. The roles come from the answer text, not from a guess about it.
The gap is counted across engines
The same question on every engine: Alpsteel recommended in 5 of 6, Ridgewell named in 3 of 6 and recommended in 0 of 6. Counts rather than rates, because six answers are too few for a percentage to mean much.
A brief is proposed with its provenance
Get the Cirrus Pro into GearBench's alpine hardshell review. That page is cited by 3 of 6 engines for this question and for 14 other questions in the workspace. Transactional intent, high priority, owner: PR.
Illustrative example · fictional data. Not a customer result.
Observed or inferred, never mixed
Every finding keeps its question, engine, market, collection time, the stored answer and its sources. Counts from stored answers are marked observed. Anything derived, like an intent weight, is marked as an estimate with its inputs listed.
A dash means it was not measured. Zero means the engines were asked and never named you.
Ridgewell is named in 3 of 6 engines for alpine hardshell questions and recommended in 0.
Observed over 12 questions · 144 answers · Aug 10–Sep 7, 2026- Question
- best hardshell jacket for alpine climbing
- Engine
- ChatGPT, web, not personalised
- Market
- United States, collected from inside the market
- Collected
- Sep 8, 2026, 06:12 UTC
- Answer
- #a7f3-2026-09-08-us-chatgpt · stored in full
- Sources in answer
- gearbench.example · trailnotes.example · alpstore.example
Questions about the data
What is observed and what is inferred?
How often does the data update?
Which engines are covered?
How are competitors detected?
How should I read the intent weight?
Start with your questions
Seven-day free trial. Pick a market, keep or edit the generated questions, and read the first stored answers within the hour.